2016 Southeast Region PDT Evaluation Form


Evaluation Form

Nashville AGA Chapter

2016 Southeast Region PDT

March 29 - 30, 2016


There are 5 questions in this survey.
  A note on privacy
This survey is anonymous.
The record kept of your survey responses does not contain any identifying information about you unless a specific question in the survey has asked for this. If you have responded to a survey that used an identifying token to allow you to access the survey, you can rest assured that the identifying token is not kept with your responses. It is managed in a separate database, and will only be updated to indicate that you have (or haven't) completed this survey. There is no way of matching identification tokens with survey responses in this survey.
 

Ratings
  • Please rate each session using the scale below.

     

    Strongly Agree

    Agree

    Slightly Agree

    Neutral

    Slightly Disagree

    Disagree

    Strongly Disagree

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1




  The learning objective(s) of the session was clearly stated. Course materials were valuable and contributed to meeting the learning objective(s). Course content was relevant to my professional responsibilities The instructor’s presentation was well organized and effective in meeting the learning objective(s). Time allocation(s) was appropriate for the topic Instructional aids (charts, diagrams, slides, handouts, etc.) were used effectively.
The Data Act (Ebberts)
Compliance and Operational Risk Management Using Data Analytics (multiple)
Accounting & Auditing Updates (Boaz & Durham)
A Leader's Responsibility in Creating an Engaging Culture (Holliday)
Fraud Detection & Prevention (Hester)
Ethical Dilemmas (Berman)
Direct Engagements and Green Book Implementation (Holbrook)
Leadership (Haston)
Uniform Grant Guidance (Boaz & Durham)
Auditor / Auditee Relations (Arnette)
If applicable, were prerequisites appropriate?

Please provide comments on the training facility:

Additional Comments:

Your Name: (optional)